Feeds:
Posts
Comments

The One-Minute Organizer Plain & SimpleThe One-Minute Organizer Plain & Simple by Donna Smallin

My rating: 3 of 5 stars

This is a great, quick read for those of us who find ourselves living comfortably in clutter, even while thinking in the back of minds that maybe we should try to get rid of that clutter. I have always loved clutter. Clutter – mine has almost always been books and papers strewn about in delightful piles and stacks – made me feel productive. It was a visual representation of things I had learned, read, was working on, would be working on, was interested in, and so on. It was a visual representation of the things I knew, things I liked, things I learned, things I wanted to learn about, things I *was.*

But apparently I have developed a different side – one that embraces minimalism. And this side wants to see me get rid of half my clothes (which I’ve accomplished … although it doesn’t look like it), and get rid of most of my books, and go digital with most of my notes, writings, pictures, music, etc. (I recently got rid of my entire CD collection, minus just a handful, and ripped the ones I wanted to keep onto my 1TB hard drive – YAY!). This minimalistic side of me wants me to be organized. It doesn’t want to find spools of yarn in my desk drawer next to the stapler and tape. It wants all of my jewelry in those little compartment boxes typically used for nails and screws. (I’ve done this. All my earrings and little necklaces are in those little compartments, and I love it.)

That’s why I picked up this book. While not all of the advice was useful – for example, I don’t have kids, so all the stuff that pertained to managing their things, and bringing them in on the de-cluttering was not at all pertinent – I did come away with lots of little tips and thoughts, which I jotted down here on my little book blog. I’m going to put that into action very soon – possibly tonight, and definitely tomorrow – and we’ll see how things go.

So if you find yourself in a similar situation, and you know you’re the kind of person, like me, who feels better enabled to accomplish even the simplest of tasks after reading a book about that task (I swear I’d read a book about proper shoe-tying techniques if there was one that wasn’t marketed to children), then this is a good start. If you’re looking for something more motivational rather than practical, I’d suggest a book about hoarding, like “Stuff.” (It’s among my reviewed books.) That will light a fire under your ass and inspire you to throw EVERYTHING away. This book, on the other hand, will help you get rid of things in a logical manner so you don’t regret it later.

View all my reviews

My brother and I argued about this one, you guys. He originally suggested a Patrick Jane (“The Mentalist”) costume, but that turned out to be wildly expensive, and I couldn’t make it work. When I announced that I was doing a Martha Jones costume instead, he argued that a Martha Jones costume wasn’t distinctive enough to be a costume. My retort was that a Sheldon Cooper costume wasn’t distinctive as a Sheldon Cooper costume, either, but it still worked as a costume.

(Same could be said for a Patrick Jane costume – it’s only a three piece suit – but I was going to include a little ceramic tea cup as a prop because I’m smart and classy like that.)

He said if he saw a girl wearing this outfit on the street, he wouldn’t think twice about it, and he certainly wouldn’t think to identify it as a Martha Jones costume. I countered by saying that if I saw a guy wearing my Sheldon Cooper costume on the street (which he felt was an actual costume, as opposed to this one), I wouldn’t necessarily think it was a Sheldon Cooper costume, although I might. I would be far more likely to be like, “Oh, there’s a guy wearing a Flash tshirt. He must like comic books. Maybe he is one of the gentlemen that Andy gets together with every Saturday night from 7pm-1am to play Dungeons and Dragons with.”

(Also, Andy blogs now! His blog link is in his twitter profile, which I linked to above. Go check it out and talk to him. He gets lonely. And I can’t tolerate him for long stretches of time. The feeling is totally mutual. He says I’m too much of a free spirit for him, and he does not appreciate such an excessive show of whimsy. it offends his exceedingly delicate sensibilities.)

But anyway, I put together a Martha Jones costume from the promo stills of Frema Agyeman and David Ten-Inch, I mean, Tennant. (Wait – WHAT did I just say?! :P Working blue.)

Ugh. Love it.

So, whatever. It’s really your call or not whether this suffices as a costume. I maintain that it passes muster. My brother is not as confident. I suppose that if all else fails you can buy a little Dalek figurine off eBay, or a Tardis coffee mug, and carry that around with you. THEN people will get it!

:D

…Okay, a lot of people still won’t.

:|

Because they are jerks who won’t watch Doctor Who no matter how awesome it is.

>:/

Especially people like Andy, who is basically the worst man.

>:C

I don’t know why I talk to him, you guys. It really does reflect rather poorly on me.

:c

Anyway, here’s the costume.

Blue Jeans ………. $15
Ruched V-Neck in Coral Sizzle ………. $12.99
Faux Leather Jacket in Brown ………. #39.98
RSVP Romala in Kid Brown ………. $19.60

Nothing too crazy: I just replicated her outfit from the promo pics.

I went with these whiskered blue jeans, and found this cute tee from Old Navy that is totally something that will blend in easily with the rest of your wardrobe. After Halloween, wear it with a cardigan and pants, and you’re totally set.

I went with brown heels, even though Martha wears either brown boots or sneakers, I think, but whatever, and then looked around for a brown or brownish red leather jacket that wouldn’t break the bank. In some pictures it looks like her jacket is red, but I’m convinced that’s just Photoshop color filtering. It’s really just a nice, rich, warm brown. This jacket from Sears was the best I could do on that end. I think it works quite well.

And there we have a Martha Jones outfit! And seriously, I urge you mightily to buy that Tardis coffee mug.

:D

If nothing else, buy it for me!

:D :D :D

Always check your sources, you guys, especially when it comes to the endless studies splashed across blogs, magazines, newspapers, and mentioned on the evening news. Check who sponsored the study, and then you’ll have the whole picture and can decide if you buy it or if you need a grain of salt … or a salt lick.

This article about how “Makeup Makes Women Appear More Competent” has been showing up on my Twitter and Facebook feeds in the past couple of days, and frankly, I wasn’t all that interested in it. I’ve read/seen countless blog posts and magazine articles and newspaper spots touting such “studies,” about how makeup and clothes and heels make women appear more competent, more assertive, more organized, younger, healthier, whatever your adjective of choice is. It gets boring.

But then I figured, you know what? It’s worth mentioning. At least in passing. I hate linking to this worthless NYT post, but the link is above if you want to check it out. You’ve already gotten the gist of it if you read the headline.

(To clarify: the article is not worthless because I disagree with the thesis. It’s worthless because it regurgitates things I’ve read over and over ad nauseum, so there’s really nothing new in it for me. It’s a very subjective kind of worthless.)

A closer look, however, justifies why I rolled my eyes so hard they almost rolled away. The ‘study’ is sponsored by Dolce & Gabbana, a company that sells makeup in addition to clothing and accessories, and Procter & Gamble.

Procter & Gamble owns, among others, Cover Girl, Max Factor, Olay (it counts), and tons of shampoo, hair care, etc, companies. For a more complete list, just for your edification, you can click here.

So, in light of this study, take that for what it’s worth.

(SPOILER ALERT: the study is not worth all that much.)

:|

My extremely minimal (usually nonexistent) makeup routine is working just fine for me, thanks.

Although, really, I find this look to be absolutely gorgeous. I wonder if I could get away with making this a somewhat everyday look (maybe with lips not quite that bright, but more of a pinky beige that works with my skin), without it being too much. Hm.

And, yes, I realize I just contradicted myself a wee bit. UNLIKE YOU GUYS, I’M NOT PERFECT. I’M ONLY A HUMAN BEING.

>:/

Ugh.

You people. With your high expectations.

  1. The Series of Unfortunate Events series.
  2. Horseradish.
  3. The movie based on his SoUE was pretty awesome, at least partly because he reportedly had considerable creative input.
  4. His name is LEMONY SNICKET for crying out loud.
  5. This article right here.

 

OCCUPY WRITERS by LEMONY SNICKET

 

The Chicago Board of Trade building. In response to #OccupyChicago protesters, those inside raised posterboards reading, "We are the 1%." Bitch, I've got news for you: If you work in an office during the week and NOT because that's your own personal choice, you are not the 1%. You work for the 1%, you plutocracy-enabling, brown-nosing bastards.

Yesterday, I did Lois Griffin, the matriarch of the Griffin clan on “Family Guy.” Today, I’m back with her daughter, Meg, voiced by Mila Kunis, who I absolutely adore. (Mila, that is. Not Meg. Although Meg’s pretty hilarious.) One of the things I love about Mila is that even though she’s, what, a B+ actress now, she’s still all into doing her Family Guy stint. She’s not like a lot of other Super Srs Aktors, who totally try to distance themselves from their first jobs on soap operas or cheesy sitcoms or in this case, cartoons.

(I’m looking at you, Leo DiCaprio. I loved Luke on Growing Pains! I cried when he left and moved to California or went and lived with his dad or whatever the hell happened! I CRIED. Granted I was like thirteen. BUT STILL.)

Yeah. Mila Kunis is awesome.

 

Here's a little something for the fellas. And, who am I kidding? For me, too. Because, wow, is she gorgeous.

 

But we’re not talking about Mila today. Well, not really.

We’re talking about Meg. Poor neglected, (verbally) abused, terrorized, ostracized, emo Meg.

I gotta be honest, you guys: I … don’t get it.

Meg is ADORABLE.

Look at her! That cute little bob, the glasses, the beanie, the layered tees, the jeans and white sneakers, the pink lips, which tell us she obviously at least TRIES in the make up department … I don’t know about this, you guys. I think she’s adorable. I don’t get the hate. I don’t get why everyone on the show is always harping on her for being ugly. I mean, I get that it’s the ‘thing’ on the show, but I still don’t get it.

Anyway, let’s see what I did with this outfit:

Bootcut Jeans ………. $15
Short Sleeve V-Neck in White ………. $8.99
Knit Scoopneck Shirred Tee ………. $9.99
Neff Reversible Beanie ………. $14.99
Keds Zelda Sneakers in White ………. $17.50
Round Black Glasses, #430021 ………. $19

Phew, lots of things. But I still made it well within my $100 budget! Go, me!

First, we have the blue jeans. I found these boot cut ones, which are going to be the most flattering and will easily assimilate into your existing wardrobe.

I paired up two tees: the white one goes on first, and the pink one is worn on top of it. This outfit features a pair of comfortable sneakers, so I found these white Keds. Just be sure not to try to zip them up in direct sunlight: you will be blind for, like, three minutes. Trust me. I know these things. And wore lots of white sneakers as a child because (1) my mom liked them and (2) I was not a terribly adventurous or raucous child, and was rather fastidious in my play, so there were hardly any fears of me racing through mud puddles or trodding on something that had started to decay.

And, of course, we have the beanie. This outfit would be NOTHING without the beanie. Nada. Goose egg. Zilch.

I even found a pair of glasses for you turds. They’re round and black and can be found at Zenni Optical. You can try to follow the link above, but I’m not real confident about it since the site wouldn’t let me direct-link to the pair I wanted. But the link will take you to the ZO site, and I included the model number, so you can put that in the search bar and find the pair you need. (Or you could use the search options on the left to narrow it down to all of the black, round, full rimmed glasses they have, and pick your favorite or the cheapest option.

And if you leave the prescription fields blank, and then specify in your order that you KNOW you left them blank, and it’s because you want 0 power glasses, they’ll fill that request, no problem. You will get a pair of frames with 0 power lenses. It’s not even an issue. I should know – I’ve gotten a fake pair of glasses from ZO before, and I’m very pleased with  them. They’re small, black, and rectangular, and give me that unamused librarian look. If/when I want another pair of fake glasses, I’m going straight to ZO.

…I swear I’m not a hipster, you guys.

:|

The lawyers on Twitter tease me and say I’m a hipster, but I’m not.

:/

My review is kind of long, particularly the part where I chose to detail some of the problems faced by the missing class, but this book is definitely worth reading. It’s incredibly appropriate at this point in our country’s history, when cities across America are being occupied by those not interested in overturning capitalism, but devoted to addressing rampant income inequality and the shrinking ranks of the middle class and painful government cuts to necessary programs like public education and college assistance and aid to low income students and the continued and flagrant disenfranchisement of the poor, minorities, youth, and undocumented.

Read this.

Ignore the fact that the foreword is by John Edwards. :| Yes, the man that tried to pass off his love child as the illegitimate child of his long-time campaign aide, Andrew Young, despite the fact that everyone in the world was like, “Dude, what are you smoking?” at that brilliant little plot.

No, but, seriously, read this.

The Missing Class: Portraits of the Near Poor in AmericaThe Missing Class: Portraits of the Near Poor in America by Katherine S. Newman

My rating: 5 of 5 stars

“The Missing Class” is defined by its authors as being comprised of families of four that make between $20,000-$40,000 annually, based on figures in 2002. I grew up in the Missing Class. My father had been in the US since the 70s, and in 82 he married my mom and they moved to Boston. I was born four years later, and my mother was living on a university stipend (she went to school and also taught at Boston University while I was little) and my father worked his way up from a teller to a manager at a bank. I was definitely part of the Missing Class, since we’ve never ever been on government assistance, and we didn’t enjoy the traditional luxuries of the middle class (yet).

That’s probably why all the stories in this book resonated so deeply. The authors follow several families/individuals for a period of years and chronicle their lives in their lower class neighborhoods. My earlier misconception was that anyone who made under a certain amount was classified as ‘working poor.’ I now understand that the term is far more nuanced and generally refers to blue collar workers, or to those on government assistance. I would have classified a clerical assistant at a doctor’s office (one rung below the secretary) making about $25K per year as one among the working poor. Not so. An individual in that $20-$40K bracket, working at a white collar job, is not classified among the working poor, but is instead a member of this murky missing class.

The stories in this book are captivating, but to not override the more academic tone. We follow families like the Rushings, the Waynes (Danielle is actually a converted Muslim, which was an interesting thing that stood out to me, as an American Muslim who is not used to seeing other Muslims pop up in studies and discourse), the Floyds, and many more. It gets a little confusing sometimes, since the book skips around between them, but if you pay attention, it’s not difficult to keep it all straight. The stories these people share are eye-opening, compelling, heart-breaking, and certainly not rare. Their stories illuminate all the problems facing the working poor in America, whose ranks have only swelled since the Bush administration as America entered its worst recession yet.

These problems include inadequate health insurance (but of course, they can’t qualify for Medicaid or Medicare, so high deductibles and low limits on coverage and expensive ER visits are their lot), the lack of affordable child care for the working mothers (again, they fail to qualify for government assistance in that respect, and can’t pay for the child care that their middle class counterparts can access), poor schooling for their children (and there have been so many cuts to public education in this country since this book was written), a fractured community where it’s very difficult to know your neighbors, put down roots, and form any kind of cohesive communal identity (a lot of this has to do with white flight, and then other-ethnic-group flight), drugs and violence (families are often unable to move out of bad neighborhoods, and bad neighborhoods are usually defined by high drug and gang presence and low cop presence), broken homes (stable long term relationships, much less marriages, are much rarer in the missing class than in the middle class), romantic relationships that have an unavoidable financial aspect (poor women need to choose suitors based on what they can contribute financially, because they have a house to maintain and children to provide for, and most seem to have poor relationships with their kids’ biological fathers, who contribute little if anything), being unaware of one’s legal rights (several people in this book had no idea, for example, that they could sue a landlord for lead paint in the apartments, or a factory owner when a machine sliced off a fingertip), being cut off from the institution of banking (few banks open brick and mortar buildings in poor neighborhoods, and many will not even offer a savings account to the poor, who are only able to deposit a couple hundred as their first foray into banking, and so the missing class often makes do with check cashing agencies that take a hefty percent, and hide money in shoeboxes, and have no credit history because of this which leads to trouble later when they save up and want to put down a down payment on a home and get pre-approved for a mortgage, etc), little access to higher education or job mobility, typical immigrant issues regarding language barriers and racism, etc, and so much more.

The problem that stuck out to me the most was the problem welfare mothers face. These are women that are home when they have no job, so they can be around to help their kids with homework and supervise them and be a regular presence at school and so on. But then, with the tougher restrictions on welfare passing during the Bush years, these mothers were forced to find work, often at low paying jobs that were quite far from their homes. They lost at least an hour each way on the commute and worked long hours. They had money coming in, but it didn’t really make a difference in terms of their household income, and they were spending all this time away from home, and their kids were poorly supervised (usually under the care of a relative). As a result, the kids would act out, they would get involved with dangerous types around the neighborhood, and because the mothers weren’t around to read to them and help them with homework, the kids’ academic performance suffered greatly. One mother in the book, Tamar, experienced this and her oldest son ended up being sent to juvy at least partly because she was no longer able to be a constant presence in his life, what with all the time she spent at work or commuting to and from work.

It’s not mentioned in the book, but I’m reminded of the story of that mother in Michigan, whose son brought a shotgun to school and shot another little girl. It made headlines, but the key facts went ignored. The child and his mother were, predictably, black. The mother was on welfare and rode the bus for 1.5 hours each way to her job at a fast food place in a mall. She had two jobs there – one at a fast food restaurant and one at some fudge shop in the same mall. She left home early and came home late. The two of them were staying at her brother’s house temporarily because she had been evicted from hers (I think). It was there that the kid found the shotgun. I could easily see that story fitting in with the narratives Newman and Chen explored here, showing an even darker side of the problems that plague the missing class.

The book itself is moving and powerful, interspersing policy arguments and studies and statistics with the stories of different families and aid workers in Brooklyn and Manhattan and Bed Stuy (mostly). The writing is engaging but academic (a tremendous feat!), and it is impossible to come away from this text unmoved.

Unless you are a Republican or Libertarian or robot, I suppose.

View all my reviews

I know it makes me a terrible feminist, and a terrible POC, and a terrible supporter of Palestine, but I do enjoy me some “Family Guy.” Come on, you have to give Seth MacFarlane some credit for basically selling Fox the SAME SHOW (Family Guy, American Dad, the Cleveland Show) three times. Although the Cleveland Show suuuuuuuuuucks. You couldn’t pay me to watch that crap.

Also, is it just me or is Seth MacFarlane kind of hot?

He's no Errol Flynn, by any means, but he reminds me of Peter Brady. I liked Peter Brady. As much as one could like a Brady, that is, They were so dweeby. You totally know they got clobbered all the time.

 

Eh, no matter.

Today’s inspiration for our work-appropriate Halloween costume is Lois Griffin, the hot, smart, hilarious redhead who is inexplicably married to fat, gross, borderline mentally handicapped jackass, Peter. She is a mother to Chris, Meg, and Stewie Griffin. Chris is fat and dumb, Meg is ugly and emo (although, personally, I think Meg is adorable – it’s just that the ‘thing’ on the show is that she’s ugly), and Stewie wants nothing more than to kill Lois.

He is also a young homosexual so far in the closet he can see the Christmas decorations from a decade ago.

Ah, I love Stewie. And Lois isn’t so bad, either.

Let’s move on and take a look at the outfit, shall we? It’s really, really easy. Oh, and don’t forget the bright red lipstick.

Womens Metro Trouser ………. $33.63
Long Sleeve Poplin Shirt in Light Blue ………. $40
Phyllis Loafer in Red ………. $24
Stone Stud Earrings in Blue ………. $6

Nothing complicated.

I went with khakis and paired them with a blue button down shirt, and added red flats and a pair of blue stud earrings. Lois, unveiled!

Of course, with this outfit, it’s not immediately apparent who you are, so you can play up the character to help people figure out who you are. And come on, who wouldn’t want to play Lois Griffin all day? She has some GREAT lines on the show. My brother loves the character for that reason. In fact, he says that Lois Griffin, Amy Adams, and the chick that plays Grace Van Pelt on the Mentalist are the three exceptions to his “No Redheads” rule.

It’s not that he’s a jerk, I promise. He just doesn’t care for redheads. Like, at all. It’s not a deal-breaker by any means; they’re just the last to catch his eye and/or pique his interest. Everyone has a type.

Anyway, here are some of my favorite quotes from Lois Griffin:

Meg: Finally, look Mom I’ve had it. I’m not babysitting anymore. It’s Saturday night I could be out having a life.
Lois: Meg, if you don’t wanna babysit anymore that’s fine, but don’t you stand there and lie to me.
Peter: OH-HO Meg, she torched your ass man! She torched your ass.

 

Lois: What’s going on down here?
Stewie: Oh, we’re playing house.
Lois: That boy’s all tied up.
Stewie: Roman Polanski’s house

(Okay, technically that’s Stewie’s line, but Roman Polanski refused to let a 13 year old girl leave his home, he slipped drugs in her drink, and then he raped and sodomized her repeatedly. He settled the civil suit, was convicted in the criminal suit, got out on bail, and fled the country. He sucks and people need to be aware of that.

Another thing: here are the idiots that support Polanski. Folks like Johnny Depp, Natalie Portman, and Whoopie Goldberg, among many others, have spoken out in support of this asswipe. Arguments made in his favor are that ‘it wasn’t rape-rape;’ ‘Roman Polanski is an artist;’ and ‘He has a wife and children.’ No one ever said actors were particularly intelligent.)

 

Meg: Wow! This looks just like my room at home!
Lois: Yeah! Except for all of the trophies and pictures of friends.

 

Lois to a sobbing Meg: Here’s a Sylvia Plath book and a bottle of Ambien. I’m gonna look the other way and whatever happens…happens.

 

OMG.

XD

Sylvia Plath and a bottle of Ambien. AHAHAHA.

:|

Bad Huma.

The other day, I put together an outfit inspired by Mister Fred Rogers of Neighborhood fame. He knows how to break-dance, you guys. It had to be done. But today I’m here with Eddie Murphy’s answer to Mister Rogers: Mister Robinson.

If you’re an SNL fan, you know all about Mister Robinson. Or maybe you don’t. Eddie Murphy played Mister Robinson during the five years that Lorne Michaels was not at the helm, so when the show went into syndication, Lorne decided that those episodes, all the ones from the five or so years that he’d spent exiled from his Saturday Night brainchild by an insane NBC executive, would not be released. That means you won’t see an Eddie Murphy or Joe Piscopo episode on E! or the other channels that show reruns. So you could be an SNL fan, like me, who watches almost religiously, but was born after 1985 and so would never have seen Eddie Murphy live on the show.

I mean, I think I could have seen Eddie Murphy, but I was busy at the time. Potty-training was important.

Click HERE for a Mister Robinson sketch. Trust me, it’s awesome.

Here are some fun pictures of Mister Robinson teaching the children some words.

Oh, that Mister Robinson.

Being such a fan of SNL, I made sure I got my hands on someone’s copies of the Eddie Murphy seasons. One of my favorite moments from those sketches was when Mister Robinson was talking about alimony as he changed his sweater and his shoes (just like Fred Rogers did), and there was a knock on the door.

He smiled real big and was like, “See, children, we have ourselves a visitor. Let’s find out who has come to see us today.” And then he turns his head to face the door and leans back and the nice, sugary sweet voice changes into this harsh yell as he screams, “WHO THAT BE.”

XD

OMG, you guys, it was HILARIOUS. I died.

Anyway, on to the outfit.

Relaxed Fit Twill Denim Jeans ………. $25.90
Washed Tee in Abbey Stone ………. $9.71
Lightweight Cardigan in Sun Yellow ………. $49.50
Jonas Solid Sneakers ………. $19.98

Totally simple.

I went with black jeans and a grey-ish t-shirt, and found this awesome yellow cardigan at Dillard’s that is TOTALLY like Mister Robinson’s. I found these black tennis shoes and went $5 over budget, but that was because there weren’t a lot of other options. Ideally, I would have gone with black Chucks or PF Flyers. Heck, even Keds or a no-name tennis shoe with a white sole and white laces. I don’t much care for the black on black, but it still works for the character, I guess.

No one will know who you are in this. You’re going to have to play the character, and even then people won’t know who you are. Well, the dorks won’t know. The cool kids will know, because the cool kids all watch SNL.

:|

Oh, just let me have that one, okay, you guys?

But seriously, how fun would it be to be Mister Robinson all day? It would be AWESOME. And I’m not going to lie … not to be racist or anything … but this costume will probably work best if you’re black.

:|

I’m just saying, is all.

:/

… Not awkward, guys. Not awkward if we don’t let it be awkward.

:|

I’ll show myself out.

I loved Mister Rogers when I was little. We all did. All of us except Andy, who has informed me that even as a little boy, he would have no truck with cardigan-wearing elderly gentlemen that wanted him to join them on a trip to their magical kingdoms. He explained it to me when I failed to comprehend his meaning. Large van, something something, his parents called the cops, yadda yadda, childhood trauma, stuff, they never caught the guy, and so on. I don’t know. I only listen to like 14% of what that kid says. He’s just SO BORING. And tall.

:|

Anyway, with the exception of Andy, all of us loved Mister Rogers. We loved doing arts and crafts with him, we loved learning about how to make friends, we loved visiting that eternal termagant Lady Elaine at her museum-go-round, and we loved our field trips where he took us to go see how they printed newspapers or made peanut butter. I STILL know how they print newspapers and make peanut butter, you guys!

Ugh. He’s just so awesome, you guys. HE’S SO. FLIPPING. AWESOME.

And he knows how to break dance! Look at him go! Oh, white people are adorable.

:D

You know, except when they’re colonizing and drone-striking. Then they’re not so adorable.

:|

But to the best of my knowledge, Mister Rogers never did either of those things (Andy maintains that Mister Rogers DID in fact do both of those things), so we’re good.

Today’s outfit is inspired by Mister Fred Rogers, who is awesome and break-dances. It’s really easy. (And tomorrow, I’m doing Eddie Murphy’s answer to Mister Rogers, Mister Robinson! OMG YAY BEST CHARACTER EVER.)

SmartCare (TM) Dress Shirt ………. $14.97
Chino Trouser in Blueberry ………. $27.50
Classic Knit Cardigan in Burgundy ………. $21.90
Neck Tie in Blue and Red Diagonal ………. $24
PF Flyers in Navy ………. $23.98

See? So easy.

I went with navy blue trousers, but you could probably make do with really dark blue jeans. I added a dress shirt, a red cardigan (I wanted a zip-up, like his, but this was the best I could do with my budget, and I STILL couldn’t stay within the budget!), and a navy blue and red striped ties. Mister Rogers and his ties and sneakers killed me. What a guy.

And then I found a great pair of navy blue men’s PF Flyers. Come on. Yay.

And there we have a lovely Mister Rogers outfit!

Stuff: Compulsive Hoarding and the Meaning of ThingsStuff: Compulsive Hoarding and the Meaning of Things by Randy O. Frost

My rating: 5 of 5 stars

This book is incredible. I kind of exhausted myself writing entries about each chapter here at my book blog, but I’ll try to recap.

It is very well written, and extremely engaging. I had a really tough time putting it down. Dr. Frost is a great story-teller, and he weaves his anecdotes and character/client studies with academic studies and statistics and the like.

His description of his hoarders makes you feel like you know these people – which is why I was so frustrated while reading this book. I feel like I understand hoarding a lot better now, even if I have little sympathy for hoarders (except in cases where hoarding is a manifestation of something truly serious, like PTSD, which is something that makes total sense to me, and something that arouses great sympathy in me).

The book is well-rounded, too: it discusses hoarders, it discusses hoarding, it discusses children who grew up in a hoarder’s home, it discusses all the reasons why people can and do hoard, and it discusses treatment (though it is not a self-help book, despite the fact that I characterized it as such in my extremely rudimentary shelving system here).

It’s a great read, and I’d recommend it to just about anybody. The topic is fascinating, and the book itself is extremely engaging, well-researched, and compelling.

View all my reviews

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »