Feeds:
Posts
Comments

You’ve probably figured out by now that this is not a Business Casual Superstar post. There is no way you could wear this dress on its own and be considered a business casual superstar. I’m not sure that even a blazer, my favorite stand-by as far as chameleon-ing up my casual fashion to business casual fashion, would make a dent in the beauty and teh secks of this dress.

:|

Seriously, you guys, OMGAH, that dress.

 

Right?

(Also, it would be a killer maternity dress for those fancy occasions when you don’t want to wear a Russian circus tent that has been bedazzled or fairly doused with glitter.)

Arnold Scaasi, 1958

The Museum of Fine Arts, Boston

Well, this is awkward.

Last week, I was obscenely busy. And I’ve spent most of this week so far hopped up on various pain meds – whichever pills I can shove into my mouth, really, since I’m not all that picky – and see no reason for any of this changing before Friday.

(Girl talk: cramps. Bad ones. As usual. Uteruses are not your friends. Uterii?)

So I’ll be back next week when I can actually devote some thought to planning out posts and having some sort of theme (perhaps weeklong!) going with my outfits.

Translation: when I am lucid.

For now, I am just going to read Lemony Snicket books. Or I will, once the words stop being fuzzy and crawling around the page like little caterpillars. Caterpillii?

Until then, here is a picture of something.

Whenever I wear my hair either fully up or half-up, I always grab a pair of earrings. If I know I’m headed to a rather formal setting (more emphasis on business rather than casual) I’ll go with something small and short, something that barely hangs a half inch off my earlobe. If I’m headed to a less formal work setting (more emphasis on casual rather than business) I’ll wear something a little longer. No worries, I save the supremely dangly earrings for nights out. Those don’t really belong in many offices, anyway.

(Although I have a friend who works at a marketing firm, a pretty artsy one, and she can always get away with super dangly earrings, especially if the rest of her outfit is kind of minimalist, so this isn’t a hard and fast rule, just a general one that I personally use.)

So today, I want to share some earrings I like. Some will be formal-ish: small and conservative. Some will be slightly more daring and a little dangly. All will be under $25, because I don’t like spending more than that for earrings – a personal hang-up. It’s why I love going to the little art fairs in my town where local jewelry makers offer their wares: I can always find relatively unique (ie, not mass-produced) jewelry, especially earrings, for a fraction of what I’d pay for similar pieces at a store.

Check your town newsletter or website for similar fairs – I’m sure there are some going on in your area! There are also regional ones, and other, similar festivals like the Renaissance Fair and other cultural festivities going on will often also be a place where local jewelry makers will show up with their goods. If you’re a thrifter, I’m sure you’re aware of how to find great, unique pieces at local Goodwill stores. Regrettably, I am not a thrifter. I just get bored and wander off to go buy candy in the middle (okay, beginning) of my thrifting excursion.

It’s become a problem. Basically, any time I’m frustrated while shopping, especially if I’m trying to buy pants that actually fit my petite, ridiculously short, narrow-waisted lower half, I just wander off and buy candy.

Anyway, here we go! Earrings, earrings, earrings! As always, click to purchase.

 

$22.80

$10

$16.80

$8.99

$12

$25

$11.99

 

And there we have a whole bunch of affordable, adorable earrings!

Yep. Today, I’m comin’ atcha with a Luigi costume. For girls! (I’ll get to the boys’ version tomorrow, hopefully.) Trust me when I say that this is awesome, you guys. I was in my brother’s room, poking around, as is my way (I was actually looking for the iHome that he borrowed from me), and I saw these super old Nintendo cartridges from when I was a kid.

I was born in 1986, and the original Nintendo console was big when I was a kid. For some inexplicable reason, we had one. I don’t know why. My parents were both immigrants (legal citizens, naturalized, everything). My mom had just come to the country for the first time in 1982, while my dad had been here since 1971.

They were young and educated, but due to the fact that they had basically uprooted their lives and come to the states when Boston University offered my mom a full ride for her Masters and PhD in Economics if she taught a computer class or two, they were still in the missing class – the class between lower middle class and the working poor, who are on government assistance. They never took government assistance of any kind, except normal charity deductions on their taxes, blah blah, but they certainly weren’t middle class. Hell, the only reason we were able to afford living in a big house (two very spacious living units, basically a vertical townhouse) that looked just like the home JFK grew up in – except ours had a much better paint job – was because our elderly Italian landlady loved my parents and never raised the rent over $300 in the 16ish years we lived there.

Anyway, long tangent aside, these people were the LAST people on the planet that you’d think would buy a Nintendo console of their own volition. I still have no idea why they did. I mean, I was 4 when we got it. I was an only child. My parents didn’t have a ton of extra money to throw around and would likely have deemed a gaming console, when neither one of them had EVER played video games, a frivolity.

Who knows? Maybe my dad was persuaded by one of those studies that said that video games increased hand-eye coordination and so he bought one for me. Maybe he was at the store one day and it tickled his fancy and he just went for it. Maybe the kids of some of his friends had it and loved it and he bought it so they’d have something fun to do when they came over to our house. Maybe my mom bugged him to get it for her. I don’t know. I should ask.

Anyway, we had that super old Nintendo console with the one cartridge that had both Duck Hunt and Super Mario on it. You know the one. Every now and then it wouldn’t work so you would have to pull it out and blow on it and then put it back in. That’s what she said.

I was so flipping good at Duck Hunt as a four year old, but God, I hated that stupid dog. Who didn’t?

(Although, seriously, this is a pretty hilarious tattoo.)

I wasn’t brave enough to try Super Mario at age four (it was scary, as most things were at that age and also at this, my current age), so I left it alone. My mother, on the other hand, loved it.

She was a student/adjunct professor at that time, and she was working on her dissertation. Two nights a week, she’d leave me with my dad and he’d make me spaghetti while she went and taught some computer class at BU. I don’t know why they had her teaching computers – C++ and Pascal and Fortran – because she didn’t know one thing about those languages. She used to tell me that she taught it by staying one lesson ahead of her students. Ahahaha.  (She was serious. I suspect at least one of my professors during law school did the same thing.)

So sometimes, when she was sick of studying, sick of housework, sick of writing and doing her lame econometrics calculations, and sick of me, she’d put me down for my nap after lunch and instead of watching her soaps (devotees would remember that as a new American, my mother started watching ABC soaps as soon as she got off the plane in Boston because she wanted to learn all about the American culture of extra marital affairs and evil twin brothers and long lost babies that were supposed to be dead but weren’t and were back in town and f—king your new husband of two weeks – it’s a rich heritage you guys have, really) would play Super Mario.

She would play it compulsively, you guys. By her own admission. Like Alberto Gonzales, I have no recollection of this. I was too busy napping and mediating fights between my giant grey rabbit and my normal-sized blue velvet rhinoceros. (They were each jealous of the attention the other got.)

But my mom would be in the living room, clicking away on that little controller, trying to get past the level with the flying mushroom things that try to kill you and rescue Princess Peach who was always off getting herself into trouble.

She was ADDICTED.

A year or so later, I was into it, too, so we’d play together. And then she started playing less, so I just played on my own, but eventually grew out of it.

So today’s outfit is inspired by one of the players in this old game, Luigi. And this outfit is for the girls – all the girls that used to love playing Super Mario. <3

A little bit of history: Luigi is Mario’s younger brother. He’s taller, thinner, and has his own little costume that is distinct from his brother’s. Whereas Mario is reportedly named after real estate developer Mario A. Segale, who owned the Nintendo America headquarters and barged in one day, very angry, demanding that the late rent payment be made immediately, before agreeing to give them some more time and leaving without it (although Mario remains tight-lipped about his immortalization and says he’s still waiting for the royalty checks), Luigi was named for a pizza parlor near Nintendo America headquarters named, you guessed it, Mario & Luigi’s.

After telling you way too much about my family and upbringing, let’s get on to the outfit.

Overalls ………. $28.90
3/4 Sleeve Scoop Neck in Rainforest ………. $14.99
Wingtip Oxfords ………. $15.99
Pistil Cami Cap in Green ………. $27

These overalls were the best I could find as far as the selection for women was concerned. There are nowhere near enough overalls for women, you guys! Which, I guess, is a good thing. Overalls are only adorable on children, and appropriate for children and farmers.

These ones from Forever21 are cropped and fitted, for a more ‘feminine’ look or whatever (it’s not girly unless it’s skin-tight, I guess), so … eh. I paired them with this green top, and I just felt like going with brown oxfords. Luigi wears closed toe, no-frills shoes, but these just kind of stood out to me. So why not?

Finally, I topped it all off with a green cap that I found at Zappo’s that fits the bill (hah) quite nicely, I think.

And there we have a great business casual adaptation of Luigi’s costume for girls. And way too much information about the socio-economic aspect of my upbringing.

o_O

 

The One-Minute Organizer Plain & SimpleThe One-Minute Organizer Plain & Simple by Donna Smallin

My rating: 3 of 5 stars

This is a great, quick read for those of us who find ourselves living comfortably in clutter, even while thinking in the back of minds that maybe we should try to get rid of that clutter. I have always loved clutter. Clutter – mine has almost always been books and papers strewn about in delightful piles and stacks – made me feel productive. It was a visual representation of things I had learned, read, was working on, would be working on, was interested in, and so on. It was a visual representation of the things I knew, things I liked, things I learned, things I wanted to learn about, things I *was.*

But apparently I have developed a different side – one that embraces minimalism. And this side wants to see me get rid of half my clothes (which I’ve accomplished … although it doesn’t look like it), and get rid of most of my books, and go digital with most of my notes, writings, pictures, music, etc. (I recently got rid of my entire CD collection, minus just a handful, and ripped the ones I wanted to keep onto my 1TB hard drive – YAY!). This minimalistic side of me wants me to be organized. It doesn’t want to find spools of yarn in my desk drawer next to the stapler and tape. It wants all of my jewelry in those little compartment boxes typically used for nails and screws. (I’ve done this. All my earrings and little necklaces are in those little compartments, and I love it.)

That’s why I picked up this book. While not all of the advice was useful – for example, I don’t have kids, so all the stuff that pertained to managing their things, and bringing them in on the de-cluttering was not at all pertinent – I did come away with lots of little tips and thoughts, which I jotted down here on my little book blog. I’m going to put that into action very soon – possibly tonight, and definitely tomorrow – and we’ll see how things go.

So if you find yourself in a similar situation, and you know you’re the kind of person, like me, who feels better enabled to accomplish even the simplest of tasks after reading a book about that task (I swear I’d read a book about proper shoe-tying techniques if there was one that wasn’t marketed to children), then this is a good start. If you’re looking for something more motivational rather than practical, I’d suggest a book about hoarding, like “Stuff.” (It’s among my reviewed books.) That will light a fire under your ass and inspire you to throw EVERYTHING away. This book, on the other hand, will help you get rid of things in a logical manner so you don’t regret it later.

View all my reviews

My brother and I argued about this one, you guys. He originally suggested a Patrick Jane (“The Mentalist”) costume, but that turned out to be wildly expensive, and I couldn’t make it work. When I announced that I was doing a Martha Jones costume instead, he argued that a Martha Jones costume wasn’t distinctive enough to be a costume. My retort was that a Sheldon Cooper costume wasn’t distinctive as a Sheldon Cooper costume, either, but it still worked as a costume.

(Same could be said for a Patrick Jane costume – it’s only a three piece suit – but I was going to include a little ceramic tea cup as a prop because I’m smart and classy like that.)

He said if he saw a girl wearing this outfit on the street, he wouldn’t think twice about it, and he certainly wouldn’t think to identify it as a Martha Jones costume. I countered by saying that if I saw a guy wearing my Sheldon Cooper costume on the street (which he felt was an actual costume, as opposed to this one), I wouldn’t necessarily think it was a Sheldon Cooper costume, although I might. I would be far more likely to be like, “Oh, there’s a guy wearing a Flash tshirt. He must like comic books. Maybe he is one of the gentlemen that Andy gets together with every Saturday night from 7pm-1am to play Dungeons and Dragons with.”

(Also, Andy blogs now! His blog link is in his twitter profile, which I linked to above. Go check it out and talk to him. He gets lonely. And I can’t tolerate him for long stretches of time. The feeling is totally mutual. He says I’m too much of a free spirit for him, and he does not appreciate such an excessive show of whimsy. it offends his exceedingly delicate sensibilities.)

But anyway, I put together a Martha Jones costume from the promo stills of Frema Agyeman and David Ten-Inch, I mean, Tennant. (Wait – WHAT did I just say?! :P Working blue.)

Ugh. Love it.

So, whatever. It’s really your call or not whether this suffices as a costume. I maintain that it passes muster. My brother is not as confident. I suppose that if all else fails you can buy a little Dalek figurine off eBay, or a Tardis coffee mug, and carry that around with you. THEN people will get it!

:D

…Okay, a lot of people still won’t.

:|

Because they are jerks who won’t watch Doctor Who no matter how awesome it is.

>:/

Especially people like Andy, who is basically the worst man.

>:C

I don’t know why I talk to him, you guys. It really does reflect rather poorly on me.

:c

Anyway, here’s the costume.

Blue Jeans ………. $15
Ruched V-Neck in Coral Sizzle ………. $12.99
Faux Leather Jacket in Brown ………. #39.98
RSVP Romala in Kid Brown ………. $19.60

Nothing too crazy: I just replicated her outfit from the promo pics.

I went with these whiskered blue jeans, and found this cute tee from Old Navy that is totally something that will blend in easily with the rest of your wardrobe. After Halloween, wear it with a cardigan and pants, and you’re totally set.

I went with brown heels, even though Martha wears either brown boots or sneakers, I think, but whatever, and then looked around for a brown or brownish red leather jacket that wouldn’t break the bank. In some pictures it looks like her jacket is red, but I’m convinced that’s just Photoshop color filtering. It’s really just a nice, rich, warm brown. This jacket from Sears was the best I could do on that end. I think it works quite well.

And there we have a Martha Jones outfit! And seriously, I urge you mightily to buy that Tardis coffee mug.

:D

If nothing else, buy it for me!

:D :D :D

Always check your sources, you guys, especially when it comes to the endless studies splashed across blogs, magazines, newspapers, and mentioned on the evening news. Check who sponsored the study, and then you’ll have the whole picture and can decide if you buy it or if you need a grain of salt … or a salt lick.

This article about how “Makeup Makes Women Appear More Competent” has been showing up on my Twitter and Facebook feeds in the past couple of days, and frankly, I wasn’t all that interested in it. I’ve read/seen countless blog posts and magazine articles and newspaper spots touting such “studies,” about how makeup and clothes and heels make women appear more competent, more assertive, more organized, younger, healthier, whatever your adjective of choice is. It gets boring.

But then I figured, you know what? It’s worth mentioning. At least in passing. I hate linking to this worthless NYT post, but the link is above if you want to check it out. You’ve already gotten the gist of it if you read the headline.

(To clarify: the article is not worthless because I disagree with the thesis. It’s worthless because it regurgitates things I’ve read over and over ad nauseum, so there’s really nothing new in it for me. It’s a very subjective kind of worthless.)

A closer look, however, justifies why I rolled my eyes so hard they almost rolled away. The ‘study’ is sponsored by Dolce & Gabbana, a company that sells makeup in addition to clothing and accessories, and Procter & Gamble.

Procter & Gamble owns, among others, Cover Girl, Max Factor, Olay (it counts), and tons of shampoo, hair care, etc, companies. For a more complete list, just for your edification, you can click here.

So, in light of this study, take that for what it’s worth.

(SPOILER ALERT: the study is not worth all that much.)

:|

My extremely minimal (usually nonexistent) makeup routine is working just fine for me, thanks.

Although, really, I find this look to be absolutely gorgeous. I wonder if I could get away with making this a somewhat everyday look (maybe with lips not quite that bright, but more of a pinky beige that works with my skin), without it being too much. Hm.

And, yes, I realize I just contradicted myself a wee bit. UNLIKE YOU GUYS, I’M NOT PERFECT. I’M ONLY A HUMAN BEING.

>:/

Ugh.

You people. With your high expectations.

  1. The Series of Unfortunate Events series.
  2. Horseradish.
  3. The movie based on his SoUE was pretty awesome, at least partly because he reportedly had considerable creative input.
  4. His name is LEMONY SNICKET for crying out loud.
  5. This article right here.

 

OCCUPY WRITERS by LEMONY SNICKET

 

The Chicago Board of Trade building. In response to #OccupyChicago protesters, those inside raised posterboards reading, "We are the 1%." Bitch, I've got news for you: If you work in an office during the week and NOT because that's your own personal choice, you are not the 1%. You work for the 1%, you plutocracy-enabling, brown-nosing bastards.

Yesterday, I did Lois Griffin, the matriarch of the Griffin clan on “Family Guy.” Today, I’m back with her daughter, Meg, voiced by Mila Kunis, who I absolutely adore. (Mila, that is. Not Meg. Although Meg’s pretty hilarious.) One of the things I love about Mila is that even though she’s, what, a B+ actress now, she’s still all into doing her Family Guy stint. She’s not like a lot of other Super Srs Aktors, who totally try to distance themselves from their first jobs on soap operas or cheesy sitcoms or in this case, cartoons.

(I’m looking at you, Leo DiCaprio. I loved Luke on Growing Pains! I cried when he left and moved to California or went and lived with his dad or whatever the hell happened! I CRIED. Granted I was like thirteen. BUT STILL.)

Yeah. Mila Kunis is awesome.

 

Here's a little something for the fellas. And, who am I kidding? For me, too. Because, wow, is she gorgeous.

 

But we’re not talking about Mila today. Well, not really.

We’re talking about Meg. Poor neglected, (verbally) abused, terrorized, ostracized, emo Meg.

I gotta be honest, you guys: I … don’t get it.

Meg is ADORABLE.

Look at her! That cute little bob, the glasses, the beanie, the layered tees, the jeans and white sneakers, the pink lips, which tell us she obviously at least TRIES in the make up department … I don’t know about this, you guys. I think she’s adorable. I don’t get the hate. I don’t get why everyone on the show is always harping on her for being ugly. I mean, I get that it’s the ‘thing’ on the show, but I still don’t get it.

Anyway, let’s see what I did with this outfit:

Bootcut Jeans ………. $15
Short Sleeve V-Neck in White ………. $8.99
Knit Scoopneck Shirred Tee ………. $9.99
Neff Reversible Beanie ………. $14.99
Keds Zelda Sneakers in White ………. $17.50
Round Black Glasses, #430021 ………. $19

Phew, lots of things. But I still made it well within my $100 budget! Go, me!

First, we have the blue jeans. I found these boot cut ones, which are going to be the most flattering and will easily assimilate into your existing wardrobe.

I paired up two tees: the white one goes on first, and the pink one is worn on top of it. This outfit features a pair of comfortable sneakers, so I found these white Keds. Just be sure not to try to zip them up in direct sunlight: you will be blind for, like, three minutes. Trust me. I know these things. And wore lots of white sneakers as a child because (1) my mom liked them and (2) I was not a terribly adventurous or raucous child, and was rather fastidious in my play, so there were hardly any fears of me racing through mud puddles or trodding on something that had started to decay.

And, of course, we have the beanie. This outfit would be NOTHING without the beanie. Nada. Goose egg. Zilch.

I even found a pair of glasses for you turds. They’re round and black and can be found at Zenni Optical. You can try to follow the link above, but I’m not real confident about it since the site wouldn’t let me direct-link to the pair I wanted. But the link will take you to the ZO site, and I included the model number, so you can put that in the search bar and find the pair you need. (Or you could use the search options on the left to narrow it down to all of the black, round, full rimmed glasses they have, and pick your favorite or the cheapest option.

And if you leave the prescription fields blank, and then specify in your order that you KNOW you left them blank, and it’s because you want 0 power glasses, they’ll fill that request, no problem. You will get a pair of frames with 0 power lenses. It’s not even an issue. I should know – I’ve gotten a fake pair of glasses from ZO before, and I’m very pleased with  them. They’re small, black, and rectangular, and give me that unamused librarian look. If/when I want another pair of fake glasses, I’m going straight to ZO.

…I swear I’m not a hipster, you guys.

:|

The lawyers on Twitter tease me and say I’m a hipster, but I’m not.

:/

My review is kind of long, particularly the part where I chose to detail some of the problems faced by the missing class, but this book is definitely worth reading. It’s incredibly appropriate at this point in our country’s history, when cities across America are being occupied by those not interested in overturning capitalism, but devoted to addressing rampant income inequality and the shrinking ranks of the middle class and painful government cuts to necessary programs like public education and college assistance and aid to low income students and the continued and flagrant disenfranchisement of the poor, minorities, youth, and undocumented.

Read this.

Ignore the fact that the foreword is by John Edwards. :| Yes, the man that tried to pass off his love child as the illegitimate child of his long-time campaign aide, Andrew Young, despite the fact that everyone in the world was like, “Dude, what are you smoking?” at that brilliant little plot.

No, but, seriously, read this.

The Missing Class: Portraits of the Near Poor in AmericaThe Missing Class: Portraits of the Near Poor in America by Katherine S. Newman

My rating: 5 of 5 stars

“The Missing Class” is defined by its authors as being comprised of families of four that make between $20,000-$40,000 annually, based on figures in 2002. I grew up in the Missing Class. My father had been in the US since the 70s, and in 82 he married my mom and they moved to Boston. I was born four years later, and my mother was living on a university stipend (she went to school and also taught at Boston University while I was little) and my father worked his way up from a teller to a manager at a bank. I was definitely part of the Missing Class, since we’ve never ever been on government assistance, and we didn’t enjoy the traditional luxuries of the middle class (yet).

That’s probably why all the stories in this book resonated so deeply. The authors follow several families/individuals for a period of years and chronicle their lives in their lower class neighborhoods. My earlier misconception was that anyone who made under a certain amount was classified as ‘working poor.’ I now understand that the term is far more nuanced and generally refers to blue collar workers, or to those on government assistance. I would have classified a clerical assistant at a doctor’s office (one rung below the secretary) making about $25K per year as one among the working poor. Not so. An individual in that $20-$40K bracket, working at a white collar job, is not classified among the working poor, but is instead a member of this murky missing class.

The stories in this book are captivating, but to not override the more academic tone. We follow families like the Rushings, the Waynes (Danielle is actually a converted Muslim, which was an interesting thing that stood out to me, as an American Muslim who is not used to seeing other Muslims pop up in studies and discourse), the Floyds, and many more. It gets a little confusing sometimes, since the book skips around between them, but if you pay attention, it’s not difficult to keep it all straight. The stories these people share are eye-opening, compelling, heart-breaking, and certainly not rare. Their stories illuminate all the problems facing the working poor in America, whose ranks have only swelled since the Bush administration as America entered its worst recession yet.

These problems include inadequate health insurance (but of course, they can’t qualify for Medicaid or Medicare, so high deductibles and low limits on coverage and expensive ER visits are their lot), the lack of affordable child care for the working mothers (again, they fail to qualify for government assistance in that respect, and can’t pay for the child care that their middle class counterparts can access), poor schooling for their children (and there have been so many cuts to public education in this country since this book was written), a fractured community where it’s very difficult to know your neighbors, put down roots, and form any kind of cohesive communal identity (a lot of this has to do with white flight, and then other-ethnic-group flight), drugs and violence (families are often unable to move out of bad neighborhoods, and bad neighborhoods are usually defined by high drug and gang presence and low cop presence), broken homes (stable long term relationships, much less marriages, are much rarer in the missing class than in the middle class), romantic relationships that have an unavoidable financial aspect (poor women need to choose suitors based on what they can contribute financially, because they have a house to maintain and children to provide for, and most seem to have poor relationships with their kids’ biological fathers, who contribute little if anything), being unaware of one’s legal rights (several people in this book had no idea, for example, that they could sue a landlord for lead paint in the apartments, or a factory owner when a machine sliced off a fingertip), being cut off from the institution of banking (few banks open brick and mortar buildings in poor neighborhoods, and many will not even offer a savings account to the poor, who are only able to deposit a couple hundred as their first foray into banking, and so the missing class often makes do with check cashing agencies that take a hefty percent, and hide money in shoeboxes, and have no credit history because of this which leads to trouble later when they save up and want to put down a down payment on a home and get pre-approved for a mortgage, etc), little access to higher education or job mobility, typical immigrant issues regarding language barriers and racism, etc, and so much more.

The problem that stuck out to me the most was the problem welfare mothers face. These are women that are home when they have no job, so they can be around to help their kids with homework and supervise them and be a regular presence at school and so on. But then, with the tougher restrictions on welfare passing during the Bush years, these mothers were forced to find work, often at low paying jobs that were quite far from their homes. They lost at least an hour each way on the commute and worked long hours. They had money coming in, but it didn’t really make a difference in terms of their household income, and they were spending all this time away from home, and their kids were poorly supervised (usually under the care of a relative). As a result, the kids would act out, they would get involved with dangerous types around the neighborhood, and because the mothers weren’t around to read to them and help them with homework, the kids’ academic performance suffered greatly. One mother in the book, Tamar, experienced this and her oldest son ended up being sent to juvy at least partly because she was no longer able to be a constant presence in his life, what with all the time she spent at work or commuting to and from work.

It’s not mentioned in the book, but I’m reminded of the story of that mother in Michigan, whose son brought a shotgun to school and shot another little girl. It made headlines, but the key facts went ignored. The child and his mother were, predictably, black. The mother was on welfare and rode the bus for 1.5 hours each way to her job at a fast food place in a mall. She had two jobs there – one at a fast food restaurant and one at some fudge shop in the same mall. She left home early and came home late. The two of them were staying at her brother’s house temporarily because she had been evicted from hers (I think). It was there that the kid found the shotgun. I could easily see that story fitting in with the narratives Newman and Chen explored here, showing an even darker side of the problems that plague the missing class.

The book itself is moving and powerful, interspersing policy arguments and studies and statistics with the stories of different families and aid workers in Brooklyn and Manhattan and Bed Stuy (mostly). The writing is engaging but academic (a tremendous feat!), and it is impossible to come away from this text unmoved.

Unless you are a Republican or Libertarian or robot, I suppose.

View all my reviews

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »